Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Retooling U.S. Foreign Policy

Victor Davis Hanson thinks:

On the other fronts, the outlook is not so encouraging. Iran was given a great gift with the National Intelligence Estimate’s de facto clean bill on nuclear proliferation, a finding that undermined almost all current multilateral efforts to embargo or boycott the theocracy until it is transparent about enrichment.

Somehow our politically tainted intelligence agencies argued the near laughable: claiming that Iran stopped making the bomb in 2003 (so that we need not worry now), and yet insisting that such abrupt cessation had nothing to do, as was true in the case of Libya, with our removal of Saddam Hussein (so that no one gets any credit). Far from drawing us back from the brink, the naïve and politicized findings — meant to restrain the much caricatured Bush — have instead only eroded much of the peaceful avenues to prevent Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon (Stanley Kurtz has argued here).


Read it here.

To The Polls

Courtesy of the StarPhoenix

"Note who is laying the boobytraps and the trip wires. It's the government," said Goodale from Ottawa.

"Stephane Dion will not be content in just picking holes in the activities of the Conservative government. They have presented us with a target-rich environment but Mr. Dion will have a clearly-articulated platform . . . to lay out in detail how we would do things differently and better."


Whenever Mr. Goodale or anybody in the Liberal party, really, I wonder how long it will take the Martinites to give up and go home. Paul Martin used language like this all the time. Mr. Martin, I swear said clearly a billion time in the last election. Usually to state soemthing like "Clearly, I'm being perfectly clear when you ask me that question that I clearly can't give a straight answer to. Yes, absolutely, positively"

I digress. So where is Mr. Goodale going with this? Clearly, when Mr. Dion get's his nth chance to prove to Canadians he isn't a promise gone horribly wrong his talking heads will say he's "clearly-articulated" in the hopes of mitigating Dion's mangling of "da Hanglish".

This is two major cracks in the Liberal tough guy facade they've been masquerading around in. I wonder which confidence vote suits Mr. Dion's fancy. Oops, make that three

Isn't time that some sort of "cowboy" pic of Dion to be plastered across the front pages of all the dailies? I wonder if Dion can catch a football?

Monday, February 11, 2008

We Throw Pies, Too

The Hoax.

What I think about it:

Is it beyond the pale? No, not really. It's hardly any different from a conservative or some other leftie villain getting pied. It signifies nothing and I would bet has only further re-enforced a portion of the right's appraisal of him. Mr. Kinsella will not lose any friends over it and we 'speechy-nistas' will benefit nothing. Nothing.

I'm a supporter of FreeDominion.ca,Ezra Levant, Maclean's / Steyn and stridently opposed to Warren Kinsella and The CJC (in what I believe is a gross over-extension of any religous authority's purview). But I fail to see the advantage to be gained here (except to heighten the noteriety of the hoaxer) for conservatives but more importantly, free speech in Canada.

Warren Kinsella, is an incidental player, a good humored one at that. He is no different from any of us who post our opinions on the blog-o-sphere. If and when Levant and company meet their executioner, it won't be Warren's face under the hood. Pie throwing will avail them, not.

I wonder though, doesn't that arm marked by the fake holocaust number look a little tight to be 60+ years old? Makes me wonder who is getting "got" here?

More Doh

Why did I remove the post about Kinsella?

Well, whatever Warren accomplished by posting the bathroom wall Nazi image, he did so in good faith. I was grossly insensitive to that and by extension to jews everywhere. This occured to me on Sunday and that whatever my concerns were they were better served through debate, point-counterpoint, sturmm und drang, whatever.

I feel doubly justified in my actions in light of the recent hoax played on Mr. Kinsella.

FULL DISCOSURE:

I made no remarks towards jews. I was being a perfect right-wing krank and I was being a little insulting to Mr. Kinsella. C'mon, I'm a neo-con, people.

The Sun Says It

Peter Worthington thinks Billary's demise is sealed. Now, I wouldn't say it just yet, having predicted to myself that she was going down and having that thwarted by the wily Clintons. Twice.

More Clinton-Obama:

Hillary Clinton replaces loyal campaign manager
Maine Puts Topper On Obama Sweep
Clinton badly needs Virginia victory
The Note: Barack's Big Roll

Doh

I wrote some not very nice things in regards to Warren Kinsella, things I didn't need to write. I've deleted the post thinking my blerg was still sans traffic, but then saw that Warren(name used for response) had posted a response here.

This is the text:

"No, like you they are too gutless to send an email using their real name.

They fear shame. You do to it turns out."

Not for anything I believe, but in my conduct towards you in the post I've removed.

My apologies for pissing you off.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Romney Out

Mitt Romney is out.

"If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror," Romney told the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington


That is the best possible spin he could put on this, I think. Here's hoping McCain comes to his senses and tags him for VP. He'll need everything Romney offers in electibility.

The Floodgates Crack Just A Little?

The Western Standard has it.

If anybody had a right to complain to an HRC for the same offense suffered by Mohamed Elmasry it's the Christians. Who's next?

Update:

And there is this from the Standard.

NYT on Clinton and Some Obama

This is the headline:

Obama and Clinton Settle In for the Long Run

Yet, a scant 2 paragraphs are devoted to Mr. Obama and one of them is a quote. The rest is about Hillary's campaign for her inevitable rise to the Presidancy and some Republican coverage.

Mrs. Clinton and her advisers countered that she should now be considered the underdog, even though they believe she emerged from Tuesday’s voting with a small lead in delegates, though the actual delegate totals remained muddled. Mrs. Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, said in a conference call Wednesday afternoon that Mr. Obama had become the candidate of the Democratic “establishment,” because of his endorsement by Senator Edward M. Kennedy and a number of other senators and governors.


Maybe she is the underdog. Who knows? The comeback-kid meme seems to work for Billary and if ain't broke...

Update:

Hmmmm...

Clinton Loans Herself Money For Campaign

Mrs. Clinton, the word inevitable doesn't mean the same thing as persistance. Wonder if she'll pay her employees.

Bourqe Posts A Bunch

Bourque has lots o' links for y'all. Cuz he doesn't host and overwrites his page, here there are.

NATO

MACKAY'S STERN WARNING TO NATO
NATO MEMBERS LIKELY TO IGNORE PLEAS TO SHARE AFGHAN BURDEN
AFGHAN FAILURE WILL BRING TERROR TO THE WEST
FRANCE MULLS TROOPS FOR MISSION IN SOUTH
WEEKLY AFGHAN BRIEFINGS TO BEGIN

Canada / Afghan Politics

LIBERALS DIVIDED
Weston: War without end
NatPost: Afghan showdown
Mayeda/O'neill: Should we stay or leave
Martin: PM stakes power on Afghanistan
CalHrld: Libs must decide on Afghanistan
Yaffe: Tories get Afghan reality check
Spencer: A war on two fronts

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Frank Zappa's King Kong

The BBC, despite being a state-run entity manages to create decent programming. From comedy to drama to history the Beeb does it so well. If only their news division could keep up.

As for music I offer this as a testament to the BBC's commitment to posterity rather than nightly ratings. The Inestimable Frank Zappa and the (Original) Mothers of Invention.

Some Super Tuesday Reportage

From ABC. McCain soars and the Romney and Huckabee with the Dem candidates are back in fighting form, until the next primary when they start playing nice again.

Harper's First One on One Interview

the IRPP has an interview with Prime Minister Stephen Harper nad it's his first one since his election apparently.

Note the response that Harper intends to govern until 2009. That may change when the Afghan mission goes to a confidence motion. The mandate set by the Conservatives to govern though to 2009 could only work if the opposition let them govern, otherwise if the coservatives actually held fast to their mandate the oppostion could effectively enforce a lame-duck Prime-ministership.

Afghanistan a Confidence Motion

Taking my advice (hehe, just kidding), the Harper Conservatives are putting their efforts to entend the mission in Afghanistan to a test of confidence. All this follows the meeting between the PM and Stephane Dion

Courtesy: CBC

Super Tuesday Results

Via Drudge

CLINTON: AR, AZ, CA, MA, NY, NJ, OK, TN
OBAMA: AK, AL, CT, CO, DE, GA, ID, IL, KS, MN, MO, ND, NM, UT

HUCKABEE: AL, AR, GA, TN, WV
MCCAIN: AZ, CA, CT, DE, IL, MO, NJ, NY, OK
ROMNEY: CO, MA, MN, MT, ND, UT

Delegates:
Clinton: 825
Obama: 732

McCain: 615
Romney: 268
Huckabee: 169

MaCain is the man and Obama landed within his target (a max difference of 100 delegates when compared to Clinton). Wonder if he'll stick around.

Update:
Yes, he will.

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

We Eagerly Await Napolean's Return

Man Alive! Figuring out where the left start and ends is a daunting task. Here is Kinsella's own opinion vis-a-vis the appropriate expression of contempt for hate groups:

Ironically, what I favour most of all is citizen-based advocacy, with no human rights commissions or Criminal Code provisions being necessary at all. Make group defamation easier to do - that is the best way for a society to express itself. When that was done in Oregon in the 1990s with the White Aryan Resistance, it put them out of business. They have never recovered. That is always the way to go, to me - citizen-based advocacy. Being condemned by a peer is always more effective than being pursued by a bureaucrat.


Hmmmm, more free speech, Warren? Not less?

* the title relates to the French Press' attitude towards Napolean as he returned from Exile and landed on France's doorstep. Prior to that he would only be referred to as a usuper of French sovereignty. Point being, as he krept closer the press did their best to appear to have always supported Napolean, thus proclaiming him, once again, Emperor of France

More Unwitting Nazis

This time the National Post rides to the rescue of the Nazis and their unwitting supporters, Levant,Steyn,FreeDominion,Globe and Mail,National Post, Keight Martin, the B'Nai Brith, Rex Murphy and it seems a great many Canadians. I wonder if the anti-speech left are finding that their stupid analogies are far from apt.

CPC for "Ancient Freedoms"

Jason Kenney (Secretary of State (Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity), CPC) and Wayne Marston (East Hamilton-Stoney Creek-NDP) square off during Question Period in Parliment.

Mr. Wayne Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, NDP):
Mr. Speaker, the Secretary of State for Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity deserves an opportunity to respond to allegations made recently by Ezra Lavant, who is head over heels for the Liberal motion that would gut the Canadian Human Rights Act. Mr. Levant says that the Secretary of State supports his view that “these commissions are violating human rights, not protecting them”.

Knowing their shared history and personal relationship, I thought it best to clarify the Conservative position on this illogical Liberal motion.

Could the Secretary of State clearly state today that all Conservative MPs will vote against the motion and that he personally condemns the motion in the strongest possible terms?

Hon. Jason Kenney (Secretary of State (Multiculturalism and Canadian Identity), CPC):
Mr. Speaker, I am absolutely on the public record defending freedom of speech. This government and this party believe in our constitutionally entrenched and protected rights to freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. We will always defend those freedoms, those ancient freedoms.


Not really an answer to the question, at least not the one Mr. Marston is asking, but it answers mine and a great many CPC supporters.

Iran On Track To Destroy Israel

The Mossad thinks Iran will have nukes within three years.

Fruther down the page Brietbart thinks it's about perception:

Israel has long perceived Iran as its greatest threat, especially after Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad relaunched its nuclear enrichment programme and repeatedly predicted the demise of the Jewish state.

Mellisa Etheridge Must Be Wetting Herself

Three parent babies.

Calling Henry Kissinger...

...Stephane Dion needs your help navigating his clumsy triangulated strategy.

I love this, Dion's supreme political cock-up is PM Harpers to fix.

"Ideally, I would like to see (a consensus)," Dion said. "The Prime Minister a week ago ... said that he will come with more specifics about his position. I hope he will start to do that."

The onus is on the Conservative leader to explain how he wants to proceed with a vote in Parliament this spring that will decide the fate of the mission, Dion said. Harper said last week he hoped to line up Liberal support for the vote before presenting it to the Commons.


No doubt, Harper will play along. But, if I had my druthers, I'd druther that Mr. Harper tell Dion to put up or go make a deal with Jack Layton.

Meanwhile, Peter McKay has his hands full convincing Nato to pony up more troops. I guess the 2 Polish helicoptors will be a great help to our aid workers if our fighting men and women are pulled out of Afghanistan in 2009.

Obama Pulls Ahead

The CBC on Billary's diminishing popularity, I guess in an effort to get out in front this before they look like a bunch of Daydream Johnnies.

Update:

More from CNN/Zogby/Reuters.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama surged to a big lead over Hillary Clinton in California hours before "Super Tuesday" voting began in 24 states, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on Tuesday.


Obama has also won the first contest amongst Indonesian-Americans.

Monday, February 4, 2008

Kevin Steel is Stirring It Up.

Is this the latest salvo thrown in the debate between Free Speech Abosolutist Nazis and the Herioc Defenders of Lawyer-Speech?

Careful people, this is one hot potato!

Update:

Kinsella responds:

God's teeth! Agent Kinsella's response: so, um, Kev, I’m looking at the index to the second edition of Web of Hate, see? And it says “Grant Bristow” is found on pages 2, 235, 258-259, 273-274, 281, 293, 296, 298 and 300. (Multiple times, in some places.)


I haven't read Web of Hate and for all I know Kinsella is rattling off pages illustrating the times he had tea with Mr. Bristow sometime around turn of the 18th century.

But I do know this, and I think Kinsella will find this anology entertaining, that Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange North American initial release opted to leave out the last chapter, leaving the reader to believe that "Little Alex" had reformed to his old Ultraviolent self. But, the current edition can be found here in North America with it's 21st chapter in tact and guess what, damned if "Little Alex" doesn't grow up and decides that maybe he'd like a family-life and the domestic tranquility exhibited by his former droog, Pete. But for people who read it twenty-thirty years ago and haven't looked back, well "Little Alex" is still on about the Ultraviolence. Point being, second editions are there for a reason and sometimes the scope of the book is broadened or protracted as history and the author's tastes warrant.

But that works for Mr. Steel, too.

They All Do It

Thanks to Freedominion.ca for the heads up on the ongoing CBC scandal.

Ottawa Sun columnist Greg Weston, who was on Mike Duffy Live when Mr. Duffy received the message, said if the Conservatives want to call Mr. Rodriguez, they should also call "every single Conservative MP who sat in opposition" because they did the same thing. "This is a daily thing," Mr. Weston said. "This is the most trumped up, ridiculous pandering to the Conservative core who believe that the CBC is part of the enemy and now it´s been proven we´re part of the enemy too. Well, as you always know, if there are two lists, I want to be on the black one."


Very good, Mr. Weston. Perhaps 2008 may be the year that the media realizes it's not supposed to be so cozy with the inner circle of our nation's government.

For the sake of clarity though, there is a significant difference between shilling questions for the opposition to use in the service of partisan animation and colluding with a state sponosored reporter to significantly alter the course and purview of the Mulroney/Schreiber Inquiry. That's the main event, people.

Frankly, if Krista Erickson was lambasted for her part in the real contraversy, she was either justifiably punished or unfairly rebuked and that we can't seem to get that straightened out, Mr. Pablo Rodriguez, the Liberal Party and the CBC still have some explaining to do.

Cortesy : The Hill Times - Bea Vongdouangchanh Author

The Democrat's Quagmire

NRO has an article on the Dem's insistence that every war is in fact a repeat of the Viet-Nam conflict. The whole Viet-Nam meme didn't do John Kerry any favours but I'm betting that it won't get the Republicans any repeat business either.

In its simplest form, VS causes its sufferers to view every military action through the template of the Vietnam War. In its advanced stages, they take this tendency a step further, seeing everything that occurs in politics and government as a rerun of the 1960s and 1970s. It’s like that game where you cast your friends as characters on Gilligan’s Island.

More Support for Nazi Free Speech Absolutists?

Chinese web surfers have had it with government censorship:

Officials in our country claimed that Internet censorship is done according to the law,” Mr. Zhu wrote. “If so, why not let people know about this legal project, and why, instead, ban the Web sites that publicize and examine those legal policies? If you’re determined to do this, you shouldn’t be afraid of criticism.”

I agree Mr. Zhu. To be fair, we aren't banning web sites critical of the HRC, but it's proponents are afraid of the criticism.

The Crux of the Biscuit...

..to paraphrase the inestimable Frank Zappa. Clinton finally says it:

The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC's "This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment."


OK, the idea of taxation runs counter to core American values. So much so that politicians are forced to actually state that they are going to take away part of your average American's wages. Isn't that just the bee's knees?

Read it here

Dion, he just keeps giving...

Dion's media trouncing continues.

Mr. Dion wants an end to combat activities in a year's time and troops reassigned to training and security activities for civilian protection, development and reconstruction.

Presumably, the under-manned NATO mission won't have any problems protecting Canadian aid workers when our men and women of the armed forces come home.

Mr. Harper, let's have an election as soon as possible.

A million Government Grants...

Would never get this thing made. Here it would be called CanadaArm II.

Longest Conservative Minority

The Harper Conservatives will celebrate their two-year anniversary as a minority government. The Prime Minister distinguishes himself from the likes of Joe Clark and Arthur Mehan by being the Conservative PM to preside the longest over a minority government.

(and the longest small-c conservative, ever!)

National Post - Harper's minority still rules to make Canadian history

Ottawa Citizen - The wisdom of the minority

Sunday, February 3, 2008

A Modern Day Machievelli Gets His Come-Uppance?

Warren Kinsella thinks the latest investigation into his former bosses contracting practices is aimed squarely at him and his friends.

Didn't Machievelli state that to effectively govern a hostile or foreign nation one had to annex it's most vocal opponents?

Partisan warfare is Kinsella's specialty. Of course if he thinks a dagger dangles over his head, he would know it. But it isn't all about Kinsella, but rather his former boss and irregular contracting guidelines.

I can't help but feel that Mr. Kinsella's troubles might abate were he to avail himself of the stone around his neck. For a "Modern Day Machiavelli" it can't all be about loyalty, can it? Can Kinsella sit back and have his game played against him or worse, without him?

Like Bill "The Butcher" might say, one more time for the sweet souvenir.

Aren't HRCs powerless in the Global Age? Part II

A comment over at BigCityLib makes this distinction:

"HRC's are a mechanism by which disputes are mediated and resolved...not an instrument of censorship"

That's true, HRCs aren't explicit censors, merely unwitting ones. The case of Ezra Levant and another one against Maclean's Magazine bolster my case. That the various proponents of hate speech law can't seem to divest themselves of the logic implying that we "speechynistas" are in fact Nazi sympathizers, they are subverting the specious case against Levant/Steyn/Maclean's as more business-as-usual Nazi hunting. Though the proponents of HRCs freely admit that the HRCs maybe acting speciously in the case of Levant and Co, it has done little to help the defendants by painting them as unwitting Nazis.

Whether a malignant goverment body proclaims that they are explicit censors through legislation or on their Masthead is a pretty naive understanding of how censorship in a free democracy can exist. In countries opposed to western values of free speech, that ideal is overt, there is no pretense suggesting otherwise. In western societies, where freedom of speech is valued at a premium, (or ought be IMAO) any overt movement to supress or deny that ideal must do so via stealth or through innocuous government oversight. Though the latter is clearly less severe (probably accidental, too) than say a real campaign of goverment coerced censorship, it's effects still are felt. In this case Levant/Maclean's/Steyn and FreeDominion.ca are the ones swimming against that ripple. Unfortunately, for the HRCs professional plaintiffs, the neo-nazi issue is done and over with.

Ernst Zundel happened. No Nazi smarter than a tack will replicate the actions of Zundel. First, they will move their servers elsewhere, outside of the jurisdiction of Canada's HRCs. Failing that they'll just leave and go where they may incite "hatred" with impugnity. All the while avoiding prosecution by artfully staying within the limits of libel and slander speech codes. You may get Canadians to go along with the HRC but Americans will be a much tougher nut to crack. Maybe we could put pressure on the tinpot goverments who see a future in providng free speech services to beleaguered western states? Is anyone starting to see the cost overrun and the diplomatic legwork required to fully protect Canadians from "hate" speech in a globalized world. Let's hope so.

But that brings me to another question. Now that the big fish have been scared off will the HRCs professional plantiffs continue to hunt smaller game? Do we really need them to arbitrate the opinions of the Western Standard, Macleans and FreeDominion?

Maybe Part III will be about how conservative writers and blogcommenters now need to resort to the same evasive tactics that those grubby neo-jerries employ. What will the cost be for the service providers of Canada? Will Ezra and Mark take each other's hand and drive straight into the canyon? Will Shirlene McGovern undergo a Linda Tripp style makeover. I guess we'll see.

Note: It occurs to me that referring to the HRCs as predatory body is probably out of bounds and none too accurate. I've edited this post to correct that. My error was one of classification and not of ill intent.

Aren't HRCs powerless in the Global Age?

The following link is a video of Paul Fromm, eugenist and Confederate apologist.

Paul Fromm Speaks at 2004 Duke Conference - Part 1

There is absolutely nothing any HRC can do to stop you and me from seeing this much less preclude fevered minds from actively pursuing a violent course for redress. The "haters" need only to hop around the globe looking for any safe haven from which to peddle their bunk. Have your self a chuckle at Canada's burning of hate literature and then charging the intended recipient for the "bullet" as it were. That's pretty quaint stuff in a global village in the age of instant media.

Frankly, the world would be a nicer place without the likes of Paul Fromm or David Duke, but try to find a stone big enough to hide them under. You can't do it. Neither can the HRCs or it's many defenders.

Or Maybe China has the answer.

P.S. Tommy Douglas was a eugenist who enjoyed a Road to Damascus conversion upon seeing his Brave New World in action via The Nazis. If the HRC enforced laws in 1933 the way it enforces those laws now, at the behest of professional plaintiffs we never would have heard of the "Father of Canadian HealthCare".

Note: Again I was inaccurately imbuing Canada's HRC with the power to positively censor Canadian citizens. They can't, but professional plaintiffs can, as we've seen, with moderate success.

A Scandal from this Decade and Century...

The Chronicle Herald is reporting this. Remember how Mulroney has been repeatedly investigated for breaches of ethics, oh for what, twenty years now? Well this is a little more recent and actually has ramifications for the modern body politic.

Investigators found seven of the contracts were not properly authorized, including cases where the cost was higher than the approved amount and others where there was no signature at all.

Four of the contracts contained no statement of the work required, and in two contracts the description of the work was drawn up by the contractor rather than the government.


Good stuff, read it.

Special mention for Bourque who leads with the story on his site.

Humoring Ann Coulter

More viddy from the Billary Campaign. Strange bedfellows indeed. Funny how the left can take Ms. Coulter in good humour if it means swinging some votes, eh?

Yikes! More CNN Grief

CNN is once again under fire. It turns out their in-house conservative, Bill Bennet, donates to the McCain campaign.

The author is probably reading too much into this, Carville and Begala are notorious Clinton backers, they've worked on Bubba's campaigns for him. Now, I don't agree that they should have been taken off the air, so I wouldn't support removing Bennet. However, if he has to sit out the remainder of the Republican primary, so what?

Adler & The Tyranny of Politeness

Adler hits another one out of the ball park. Leo Strauss might say Mr. Adler was less subtle than he'd like, but sometimes the sub-text should jump out at you.

Obama - Clinton: Neck-and-Neck

Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll has Obama and Clinton running a tie race. Good news for Barrack, bad news for Billary.

Remember this?



Update:
Huffington Post is calling it an Obama Surge, that's the headline anyway. The meat is on the inside which confirms the Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll showing a close rose between the two remaining Democratic nominees.

Update II:
The New Republic has this. Putting Mr. Obama in the lead for California (didn't Hil beeline for CA after her SC trouncing?). Mitt looks like he's making some headway, too. Let's hope Mr. Romney can at least thwart Huck's veep ambitions.

Is "Section 13" doomed?

There is much ballyhoo about Liberal MP Keith Martin's private motion. In it Mr Martin call on the Canadian Government to:


M-446 — January 30, 2008 — Mr. Martin (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — That, in the opinion of the House, subsection 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act should be deleted from the Act.


While this is an ideal solution, I think exposure and time will doom the current application of Section 13 if not it's place in our constitutional order.

Let's consider that for one thing, the HRCs of this country have been benefiting from public apathy. Nothing you could attribute to any overt maliciousness, merely one of disconcern for what seemed a required function of government. The HRCs began flexing some new found muscles and with that came greater public scrutiny. The result is that Canadians know more about thier Human Rights Commissions and some will learn how to play them. Some will file frivolous lawsuits and others will attempt to supplant a higher ruling against them and use these HRCs to extract a legal victory where denied by a higher court. And yet still, others will rail against the system devising ever more clever traps by which to expose alleged biases and shenanigans. We can't forget the serially offended, either.

The nattering nabobs of the left comfort themselves in the preachy veneer of limited-speech and suggest from on high that a grown-up democracy, one that has excepted the virtues of limited speech, can overcome these challenges to human rights. But that's doubtful. Eventually the document load will get too big, too many complaints will be lodged, more layers of beuracracy, more subsections, more lawyers and presumably more HRCs.

Whatever they do, the ease with which one can lodge a Human Rights complaint will change. How meaningful it will be or can be remains to be seen. Charging money to the plaintiff would breach the tribunals mandate to afford access to minorities. There might be some promise in requiring the state to pick up the tab for aquitted defendants but would require more state oversight. And with it more partisan oversight, too.

Eventually, this gets to the Canadian people and I think that because of the free speech issues that currently sit at our doorstep we'll see an increase in advocacy for free speech heretofore unheard on the snow-baffled landscape of Canada. Which will of course add to that heavy load on the back of limited speech.

Jonah Goldberg On BNN

Here is Jonah Goldberg discussing his new book Liberal Fascism. I was pretty stunned to see him North of the Border, maybe he disguised himself as a socialist and walked right in.

A book like this is required reading for free born canucks everywhere.

Jonah's segment starts at the 32:00 mark.

More hemorrhaging on the Clinton Campaign

The Union Leader has piece by Paul Hertneky.

My guess is that this isn't indicitive of anything, but it may mean just enough of Billary's supporters are availing themselves of the "inevitable" candidate mentality that there may be considerable aggregate losses. But if the Clintons choke and weeze their way across the finish line, it all means very little. Unless of course your opponent is indistinguishable from your own self.

Um, this is Britain?

Just read it...

BigCityLibs Consternation...

Blogger's own BicCityLib laments the treament of Bill Clinton by America's MSM. ABC news reported pretty much the same thing as highlighted by Drudge earlier this week.

Slick Willie gets what he deserves, kettles and pots and all that, but he didn't say exactly what the news outlets are claiming he said. They didn't even come close to making Clintons point. If I were Barrack Obama, I'd call the media out on it, he could remind everyone that Clinton already served as president.

Also, National Review's Jonah Goldberg thinks it's pretty unfair.

Harper extends an olive branch?

The Globe & Mail hosts a discussion between Brian Laghi and the G&M's readers.

First, let me say that it's probably a good idea for Harper to adopt a more approachable position where Afghanitistan is concerned. It's quite a thing we're doing over there and quite often unclear to most of us Canadians what we're trying to achieve. We know the various positions of three of the parties, I guess we're all just wondering if the Libs are gonna flip or if they'll flop.

Give the whole article a read there's some stuff about The Hill, the CPC agenda etc...